Alaska Flag

Alaska Hospital Compliance - Detail

Surgery Patients Who Were Given the Right Kind of Antibiotic to Help Prevent Infection

Choosing the appropriate antibiotic is critical because it must be effective in preventing infections caused by bacteria likely to be present around the surgical site. Antibiotic selection therefore varies depending on the type of surgery. Guidelines for appropriate antibiotic selection have been developed by the CDC.

Navigation-arrow-left-green
Navigation-arrow-right-disabled
Summary Icon
United States Icon
Report Icon
Question Mark Icon
Medium

Alaska Hospitals with Low Compliance for this Procedure

Low compliance describes hospitals that followed this infection prevention procedure 79 percent of the time or less. The compliance level of hospitals which report a small number of cases (fewer than 25) should not be regarded as reliably predicting performance; these hospitals are displayed in italics and include Note 1. "Patients" is the number of patients for which data was submitted. The change columns describe the change in compliance and the change in the number of patients as compared to the previous quarter. Click the hospital names to access detailed information. The chart below lists hospitals in order based on the number of patients sampled (hospitals serving the largest number of patients first). You can re-sort the table by clicking on the table headers.

HospitalComplianceChangePatientsChangeNotes
1 of 12 total surgical sites.
[1] The number of cases is too small (fewer than 25) to reliably tell how well a hospital is performing.
[2] The hospital indicated that the data submitted for this measure were based on a sample of cases.
[3] Data was collected during a shorter time period (fewer quarters) than the maximum possible time for this measure (One quarter equals three months.)
[4] Inaccurate information submitted and suppressed for one or more quarters.
[5] No data is available from the hospital for this measure.
Mt Edgecumbe Hospital (< 25)67%-4.0%6-11

Alaska Hospitals with High Compliance for this Procedure

High compliance describes hospitals that followed this infection prevention procedure 95 percent of the time or more. The compliance level of hospitals which report a small number of cases (fewer than 25) should not be regarded as reliably predicting performance; these hospitals are displayed in italics and include Note 1. "Patients" is the number of patients for which data was submitted. The change columns describe the change in compliance and the change in the number of patients as compared to the previous quarter. Click the hospital names to access detailed information. The chart below lists hospitals in order based on the number of patients sampled (hospitals serving the largest number of patients first). You can re-sort the table by clicking on the table headers.

HospitalComplianceChangePatientsChangeNotes
8 of 12 total surgical sites.
[1] The number of cases is too small (fewer than 25) to reliably tell how well a hospital is performing.
[2] The hospital indicated that the data submitted for this measure were based on a sample of cases.
[3] Data was collected during a shorter time period (fewer quarters) than the maximum possible time for this measure (One quarter equals three months.)
[4] Inaccurate information submitted and suppressed for one or more quarters.
[5] No data is available from the hospital for this measure.
Central Peninsula General Hospital100%0.0%127+142
Sitka Community Hospital (< 25)100%0.0%2-11 and 3
Alaska Regional Hospital98%+1.0%49602
Fairbanks Memorial Hospital97%0.0%271-42
Ketchikan General Hospital97%+2.0%34-3
Mat-Su Regional Medical Center96%+2.0%188-10
Alaska Native Medical Center95%0.0%282+82
Providence Alaska Medical Center95%0.0%523+1702

All Alaska Hospitals

This chart describes the infection prevention compliance rates for this procedure for all reporting hospitals in the state. This list also includes hospitals that did not submit any data to CMS for this procedure or do not have cause to perform this procedure. The compliance level of hospitals which report a small number of cases (fewer than 25) should not be regarded as reliably predicting performance; these hospitals are displayed in italics and include Note 1. "Patients" is the number of patients for which data was submitted. The change columns describe the change in compliance and the change in the number of patients as compared to the previous quarter. Click the hospital names to access detailed information and re-sort the table by clicking on the table headers.

HospitalComplianceChangePatientsChangeNotes
12 of 12 total surgical sites.
[1] The number of cases is too small (fewer than 25) to reliably tell how well a hospital is performing.
[2] The hospital indicated that the data submitted for this measure were based on a sample of cases.
[3] Data was collected during a shorter time period (fewer quarters) than the maximum possible time for this measure (One quarter equals three months.)
[4] Inaccurate information submitted and suppressed for one or more quarters.
[5] No data is available from the hospital for this measure.
Central Peninsula General Hospital100%0.0%127+142
Sitka Community Hospital (< 25)100%0.0%2-11 and 3
Alaska Regional Hospital98%+1.0%49602
Fairbanks Memorial Hospital97%0.0%271-42
Ketchikan General Hospital97%+2.0%34-3
Mat-Su Regional Medical Center96%+2.0%188-10
Alaska Native Medical Center95%0.0%282+82
Providence Alaska Medical Center95%0.0%523+1702
Bartlett Regional Hospital83%-3.0%131+5
Mt Edgecumbe Hospital (< 25)67%-4.0%6-11
Wrangell Medical CenterN/AN/AN/AN/A5
Yukon Kuskokwim Delta Reg HospitalN/AN/AN/AN/A5