Alaska Flag

Alaska Hospital Compliance - Detail

Surgery Patients Whose Preventative Antibiotics were Stopped Within 24 hours After Surgery

Continuing antibiotics beyond 24 hours after the end of surgery does not offer any additional protection when it comes to preventing infections. But the prolonged use of antibiotics can be associated with other complications and can encourage antibiotic resistance.

Navigation-arrow-left-green
Navigation-arrow-right-disabled
Summary Icon
United States Icon
Report Icon
Question Mark Icon
Medium

Alaska Hospitals with Low Compliance for this Procedure

Low compliance describes hospitals that followed this infection prevention procedure 79 percent of the time or less. The compliance level of hospitals which report a small number of cases (fewer than 25) should not be regarded as reliably predicting performance; these hospitals are displayed in italics and include Note 1. "Patients" is the number of patients for which data was submitted. The change columns describe the change in compliance and the change in the number of patients as compared to the previous quarter. Click the hospital names to access detailed information. The chart below lists hospitals in order based on the number of patients sampled (hospitals serving the largest number of patients first). You can re-sort the table by clicking on the table headers.

HospitalComplianceChangePatientsChangeNotes
1 of 12 total surgical sites.
[1] The number of cases is too small (fewer than 25) to reliably tell how well a hospital is performing.
[2] The hospital indicated that the data submitted for this measure were based on a sample of cases.
[3] Data was collected during a shorter time period (fewer quarters) than the maximum possible time for this measure (One quarter equals three months.)
[4] Inaccurate information submitted and suppressed for one or more quarters.
[5] No data is available from the hospital for this measure.
Alaska Regional Hospital77%+7.0%474-32

Alaska Hospitals with High Compliance for this Procedure

High compliance describes hospitals that followed this infection prevention procedure 95 percent of the time or more. The compliance level of hospitals which report a small number of cases (fewer than 25) should not be regarded as reliably predicting performance; these hospitals are displayed in italics and include Note 1. "Patients" is the number of patients for which data was submitted. The change columns describe the change in compliance and the change in the number of patients as compared to the previous quarter. Click the hospital names to access detailed information. The chart below lists hospitals in order based on the number of patients sampled (hospitals serving the largest number of patients first). You can re-sort the table by clicking on the table headers.

HospitalComplianceChangePatientsChangeNotes
2 of 12 total surgical sites.
[1] The number of cases is too small (fewer than 25) to reliably tell how well a hospital is performing.
[2] The hospital indicated that the data submitted for this measure were based on a sample of cases.
[3] Data was collected during a shorter time period (fewer quarters) than the maximum possible time for this measure (One quarter equals three months.)
[4] Inaccurate information submitted and suppressed for one or more quarters.
[5] No data is available from the hospital for this measure.
Sitka Community Hospital (< 25)100%+33.0%2-11 and 3
Central Peninsula General Hospital97%+1.0%113+122

All Alaska Hospitals

This chart describes the infection prevention compliance rates for this procedure for all reporting hospitals in the state. This list also includes hospitals that did not submit any data to CMS for this procedure or do not have cause to perform this procedure. The compliance level of hospitals which report a small number of cases (fewer than 25) should not be regarded as reliably predicting performance; these hospitals are displayed in italics and include Note 1. "Patients" is the number of patients for which data was submitted. The change columns describe the change in compliance and the change in the number of patients as compared to the previous quarter. Click the hospital names to access detailed information and re-sort the table by clicking on the table headers.

HospitalComplianceChangePatientsChangeNotes
12 of 12 total surgical sites.
[1] The number of cases is too small (fewer than 25) to reliably tell how well a hospital is performing.
[2] The hospital indicated that the data submitted for this measure were based on a sample of cases.
[3] Data was collected during a shorter time period (fewer quarters) than the maximum possible time for this measure (One quarter equals three months.)
[4] Inaccurate information submitted and suppressed for one or more quarters.
[5] No data is available from the hospital for this measure.
Sitka Community Hospital (< 25)100%+33.0%2-11 and 3
Central Peninsula General Hospital97%+1.0%113+122
Alaska Native Medical Center94%+2.0%267+62
Fairbanks Memorial Hospital92%+5.0%270-32
Providence Alaska Medical Center92%+5.0%502+1622
Mat-Su Regional Medical Center90%+1.0%181-13
Ketchikan General Hospital88%-1.0%34-3
Bartlett Regional Hospital86%+4.0%131+7
Mt Edgecumbe Hospital (< 25)83%-17.0%6-11
Alaska Regional Hospital77%+7.0%474-32
Wrangell Medical CenterN/AN/AN/AN/A5
Yukon Kuskokwim Delta Reg HospitalN/AN/AN/AN/A5